Chess Network TV

ChessNetwork.tv

The portal to all things chess
XML Feed


19
Feb

Emanuel Lasker – Germany

Emanuel Lasker (December 24, 1868 – January 11, 1941) was a German World Chess Champion, mathematician, and philosopher born at Berlinchen in Brandenburg (now Barlinek in Poland).

Chess champion
In 1894 he became the second World Chess Champion by defeating Steinitz with ten wins, four draws and five losses. He maintained this title for twenty-seven years, the longest tenure of any officially recognized World Champion of chess. He defended his title successfully against Steinitz (1896), Frank Marshall (1907), Siegbert Tarrasch (1908), Carl Schlecter (1910) and David Janowski (1910).

His great tournament wins include London (1899), St Petersburg (1896 and 1914), New York (1924).

In 1921, he lost the title to Capablanca. He had already offered to resign to him a year before, but Capablanca wanted to beat Lasker in a match. He lost with the score of five points out of fourteen without scoring a single win.

In 1933, the Jewish Lasker and his wife Martha Kohn had to leave Germany because of the Nazis. They went to England, and, after a subsequent short stay in the USSR, they settled in New York.

Lasker is noted for his “psychological” method of play in which he considered the subjective qualities of his opponent in addition to the objective requirements of his position on the board. Richard Réti even speculated that Lasker would sometimes knowingly choose inferior moves if he knew they would make his opponent uncomfortable, although Lasker himself denied this. But, for example, in one famous game against Capablanca (St. Petersburg 1914) which he needed to win at all costs, Lasker chose an opening that is considered to be relatively harmless — but only if the opponent is prepared to mix things up in his own turn. Capablanca, inclined by the tournament situation to play it safe, failed to take active measures and so justified Lasker’s strategy. Lasker won the game. The game was a microcosm of Lasker’s style; he invested little study in the opening, was tremendously resourceful in the middlegame and he played the endgame at the highest level. Indeed, even when Lasker was in his late 60s, Capablanca considered him the most dangerous player around in any single game.

One of Lasker’s most famous games is Lasker – Bauer, Amsterdam, 1889, in which he sacrificed both bishops in a maneuver later repeated in a number of games. Some opening variations are named after him, for example Lasker’s Defense (1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Be7 5.e3 O-O 6.Nf3 h6 7.Bh4 Ne4) to the Queen’s Gambit. In 1895, he introduced a line that effectively ended the popular Evans Gambit in tournament play (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.b4 Bxb4 5.c3 Ba5 6.d4 d6 7.0-0 Bb6 8.dxe5 dxe5 9.Qxd8+ Nxd8 10.Nxe5 Be6). Lasker’s line curbs White’s aggressive intentions, and according to Reuben Fine, the resulting simplified position “is psychologically depressing for the gambit player.”

Mathematician

Lasker was also a distinguished mathematician. He performed his doctoral studies at Erlangen from 1900 to 1902 under David Hilbert. His doctoral thesis, Ãœber Reihen auf der Convergenzgrenze, was published in Philosophical Transactions in 1901.

Lasker introduced the concept of a primary ideal, which extends the notion of a power of a prime number to algebraic geometry. He is most famous for his 1905 paper Zur Theorie der Moduln und Ideale, which appeared in Mathematische Annalen. In this paper, he established what is now known as the Lasker-Noether theorem for the special case of ideals in polynomial rings.

Other facets of his life

He was also a philosopher, and a good friend of Albert Einstein. Later in life he became an ardent humanitarian, and wrote passionately about the need for inspiring and structured education for the stabilization and security of mankind. He also took up bridge and became a master at it, in addition to studying Go.

He invented Lasca, a draughts-like game, where instead of removing captured pieces from the board, they are stacked underneath the capturer.

The poet Else Lasker-Schüler was his sister-in-law.

Edward Lasker, the American International Master, engineer, and author, claimed that he was related to Emanuel Lasker. They played together in the great 1924 New York tournament.

Source page: Wikipedia under Wikipedia license
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanuel_lasker


17
Feb

Wilhelm Steinitz – Bohemia/Austria

Wilhelm (later William) Steinitz (May 17, 1836, Prague–August 12, 1900, New York) was an Austrian-American chess player and the first official world chess champion. Known for his original contributions to chess strategy such as his ideas on positional play, his theories were held in high regard by such chess players as Aron Nimzowitsch, Siegbert Tarrasch, and Emanuel Lasker.

Life

Steinitz was born in Prague (today Czech Republic, then Austrian Empire), Steinitz was regarded the best player in the world after his victory over Adolf Anderssen in their 1866 match. His 1886 match victory over Johannes Zuckertort is considered by most as the first World Chess Championship.

Steinitz defended his title from 1886 to 1894, retaining it in four matches against Zuckertort, twice against Mikhail Chigorin and once over Isidor Gunsberg. He lost two matches against Lasker, in 1894 and 1896, who became his successor as world champion. Steinitz adopted a scientific approach to his study of the game. He would formulate his theories in scientific terms and “laws”.

Steinitz became a U.S. citizen on November 23, 1888, having resided for five years in New York, and he changed his first name from Wilhelm to William.

After losing the world title, Steinitz developed severe mental health problems and spent his last years in a number of institutions in New York, making a series of increasingly bizarre claims (including that he could move the pieces by emitting bolts of electricity from his fingertips). His chess activities had not yielded any great financial rewards, and he died a pauper in his adopted home city in 1900. Steinitz is buried in Cemetery of the Evergreens in Brooklyn, New York.

Emanuel Lasker against Steinitz 1894

Lasker, who took the championship from Steinitz, once said, “I who defeated Steinitz shall do justice to his theories, and I shall avenge the wrongs he suffered.” Steinitz’s fate, and Lasker’s keenness to avoid a similar situation of financial ruin, have been cited among the reasons Lasker fought so hard to keep the world championship title.

Contributions to Chess

Steinitz began to play professional chess at the age of 26 in England. His play at this time was no different than that of his contemporaries: sharp, aggressive, and full of sacrificial play. In 1873 however, his play suddenly changed. He gave immense concern to what we now call the positional elements in chess: pawn structure, space, outposts for knights, etc. Slowly he perfected his new method of play that helped form him into the first Chess World Champion.

What Steinitz gave to chess could be compared to what Newton gave to Physics: he made it a true science. By isolating a number of positional features on the board, Steinitz came to realize that all brilliant attacks resulted from a weakness in the opponent’s defense. By studying and developing the ideas of these positional features, he perfected a new art of defense that sharply elevated the current level of play. Furthermore, he outlined the idea of an attack in chess formed off of what we now know as “Accumulation Theory”, the slow addition of many small advantages.

Though it was not immediately evident, Steinitz had just given the chess world its greatest gift. Though tactics were, and still are, the most basic element to strong play, his new theory gave greater opportunity to both defend and use the brilliant combinations the era was renowned for.

When he fought for the first World Championship in 1886 against Zukertort, it became evident that Steinitz was playing on another level. Though he suffered a series of defeats at the beginning of the match, it becomes evident when watching the games who understood the game better (for example, in the third game he was strategically superior but failed to pull it together at the end). Over time however, Steinitz’s level of play continued to improve and finished with a solid victory(+10 -5 =5).

Perhaps the evaluation of Steinitz’s impact on chess can best be evaluated by a fellow master of strategy, Tigran Petrosian: “The significance of Steinitz’s teaching is that he showed that in principle chess has a strictly defined, logical nature.”

Source page: Wikipedia under Wikipedia license
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Steinitz


17
Feb

Paul Charles Morphy – United States

Paul Charles Morphy (June 22, 1837 – July 10, 1884), “The Pride and Sorrow of Chess,” was an American chess player. He is considered to have been the greatest chess master of his time, and was unofficial World Chess Champion. [1] He was also the first chess prodigy after the creation of the modern rules of chess.

Biography

Early life

Morphy was born in New Orleans, Louisiana, to a wealthy and distinguished family. His father, Alonzo Michael Morphy, was a lawyer, state legislator, state attorney general, and state Supreme Court Justice of Louisiana. Alonzo was of Portuguese, Irish, and Spanish ancestry. Morphy’s mother, Louise Thérèse Félicité Thelcide Le Carpentier, was the musically-talented daughter of a prominent French Creole family. Morphy grew up in an atmosphere of genteel civility and culture where chess and music were the typical highlights of a Sunday home gathering.

According to his uncle, Ernest Morphy, no one formally taught Morphy how to play chess. Ernest wrote that as a young child, Morphy learned on his own from simply watching the game played. His uncle recounted how Morphy, after watching one game for several hours between his father and him, told him afterwards that he should have won the game. Father and uncle were surprised, as they didn’t think that young Paul knew the moves, let alone any chess strategy. They were even more surprised when Paul proved his claim by resetting the pieces and demonstrating the win his uncle had missed. Later, a similar story was told about the Cuban chess prodigy José Raúl Capablanca.

Childhood victories

After that Morphy was recognized by his family as a precocious talent. Taken to local chess activities and allowed to play once a week at family gatherings on Sundays, Morphy demonstrated his ability in contests with relatives and local players. By the age of nine, he was already considered one of the best players in New Orleans. In 1846, General Winfield Scott visited the city, and let his hosts know that he desired an evening of chess with a strong local player. Chess was an infrequent pastime of Scott’s, but he enjoyed the game and considered himself a formidable chess player. After dinner, the chess pieces were set up and Scott’s opponent was brought in: diminutive, nine-year-old Morphy. Seeing the small boy, Scott was at first offended, thinking he was being made fun of; but when assured that his wishes had been scrupulously obeyed, and that the boy was a “chess prodigy” who would tax his skill, Scott consented to play. Morphy beat him easily not once, but twice. The second time Morphy announced a forced checkmate after only six moves. Two losses against a small boy was all General Scott’s ego could stand, and he declined further games and retired for the night, never to play Morphy again.

In 1850, the strong professional Hungarian chess master Johann Löwenthal visited New Orleans, and could do no better than the amateur General Scott could. Morphy was 12 when he encountered Löwenthal. Löwenthal, who had played talented young players before and expected to easily overcome Morphy, considered the informal match a waste of time but accepted the offer as a courtesy to the well-to-do judge. When Löwenthal met him, he patted him on the head in a patronizing manner. He expected no more from Morphy than the usual talented young players he had played before.

When the first game began, Löwenthal got to about move 12 and realized he was up against something formidable. He slowed down his play greatly, and each time Morphy made a good move Löwenthal’s eyebrows shot up in a manner described by Ernest Morphy as “comique”. He was shocked at the power he was up against. Löwenthal played three games with Morphy during his New Orleans stay, losing all three. (Note: One of the games was incorrectly given as a draw in Löwenthal’s book Morphy’s Games of Chess and subsequently copied by sources since then. David Lawson, in his biography of Paul Morphy, listed in “Further Reading” at the bottom of this page, corrected this error, provided the moves that were actually played, and urged that game records be corrected.)

Schooling and the First American Chess Congress

After 1850, Morphy did not play much chess for a long time. Studying diligently, he graduated from Spring Hill College in Mobile, Alabama, in 1854. He then stayed on an extra year, studying mathematics and philosophy. He was awarded an A.M. degree with the highest honors.

He next was accepted to the University of Louisiana to study law. He received an L.L.B. degree on April 7, 1857, in preparation for which he is said to have learned the entire Louisiana Civil Code by heart.

Not yet of legal age to begin the practice of law, Morphy found himself with free time. He received an invitation to participate in the First American Chess Congress, to be held in New York in the fall of 1857. At first he declined, but at the urging of his uncle, who was quite proud of Morphy’s chess skill, he eventually decided to play. After securing parental permission, Morphy made the long trip to New York via steamboat up the Mississippi River and overland by railroad to New York. There, he defeated each of his rivals, including the strong German master Louis Paulsen in the final round. Morphy was now hailed as the chess champion of the United States, and such was his strength of play that many urged him to test his skill in Europe.

Morphy goes to Europe

Still too young to start his law career, soon after returning to New Orleans he was invited to attend an international chess tournament to be held in Birmingham, England in the summer of 1858. He accepted the challenge and traveled to England but ended up not playing in the tournament, playing a series of chess matches against the leading English masters instead and defeating them all except English chess master Howard Staunton who promised to play but eventually declined. At times, Staunton was physically present in the same room where Morphy easily beat the English masters. He had every opportunity to measure Morphy’s talent, and he decided not to play a single game against Morphy. During the few months he stayed in England, most of his time was spent playing blindfold games with eight people simultaneously. He won every time he played.

Staunton was later criticised for failing to play Morphy. Staunton is known to have been working on his edition of the complete works of Shakespeare at the time, but he also competed in a chess tournament during Morphy’s visit. Staunton later conducted a newspaper campaign to make it seem that it was Morphy’s fault they did not play, suggesting among other things that Morphy did not have the funds to serve as match stakes when in fact he was so popular that numerous wealthy people and groups were willing to stake him for any amount of money.

Seeking new opponents, Morphy crossed the English Channel and visited France. There he went to the Café de la Regence in Paris, which was the center of chess in France. He played a match against Daniel Harrwitz, the resident chess professional, and soundly defeated him.

In Paris he suffered from a bout of intestinal influenza and came down with a high fever. In accordance with the medical wisdom of the time, he was treated with leeches, resulting in his losing a significant amount of blood. Despite the fact that he was now too weak to stand up unaided, Morphy insisted on going ahead with a match against the visiting German champion Adolf Anderssen, who was considered by many to be Europe’s leading player, and who had come to Paris all the way from his native Breslau, Germany, solely to play against the now famous American chess wonder. Despite his illness Morphy triumphed easily, winning seven while losing two, with two draws in 1858. When asked about his defeat, Anderssen claimed to be out of practice, but also admitted that Morphy was in any event the stronger player and that he was fairly beaten. Anderssen also attested that in his opinion, Morphy was the strongest player ever to play the game, even stronger than the famous French champion Bourdonnais.

In France, as he had before in England and America, Morphy played many exhibition matches against the public. He would take on eight players at once while playing without sight of the board, a feat known as blindfold chess, the moves of his opponents and his replies being communicated verbally. It was while he was in Paris in 1858 that Morphy played a well-known game at the Italian Opera House in Paris, against the Duke of Brunswick and Count Isouard.

Morphy is hailed as World Champion

During his travels, Morphy was highly regarded. The December 1857 issue of Chess Monthly wrote that “his genial disposition, his unaffected modesty and gentlemanly courtesy have endeared him to all his acquaintances.”

Still only twenty-one, he was now famous. While in Paris, he was sitting in his hotel room one evening, chatting with his companion Frederick Edge, when they had an unexpected visitor. “I am Prince Galitzine; I wish to see Mr. Morphy,” the visitor said, according to Edge. Morphy identified himself to the visitor. “No, it is not possible!” the prince exclaimed, “You are too young!” Prince Galitzine then explained that he was in the frontiers of Siberia when he had first heard of Morphy’s “wonderful deeds.” He explained, “One of my suite had a copy of the chess paper published in Berlin, the Schachzeitung, and ever since that time I have been wanting to see you.” He then told Morphy that he must go to St. Petersburg, Russia, because the chess club in the Imperial Palace would receive him with enthusiasm.

Morphy biographer David Lawson writes that Morphy was the first to be universally hailed “The World Chess Champion”. However most chess historians place the first official world chess championship in 1886, and so regard Morphy as having been unofficial world champion.

In Paris, on April 4,1859, a banquet was held in his honor, where a laurel wreath was placed over the head of a bust of Morphy, carved by the sculptor Eugene Lequesne.

Returning to England in the spring of 1859, Morphy was lionized by the English. In London, at a gathering in his honor, he was again proclaimed “The Champion of the World”. His fame was such he was asked to a private audience with Queen Victoria. His chess supremacy was universally acknowledged and no longer did it seem fit to have him play even masters without giving him some sort of handicap. A match therefore was set up where he was pitted against five masters (Jules Arnous de Rivière, Samuel Boden, Thomas Barnes, Johann Löwenthal, and Henry Bird) simultaneously. Morphy won two games, drew two games, and lost one.

Shortly after, Morphy started the long trip home, taking a ship back to New York. At the University of the City of New York, on May 29, 1859, John Van Buren, son of President Van Buren, ended a testimonial presentation by proclaiming, “Paul Morphy, Chess Champion of the World”.

Morphy travelled home slowly, stopping in all of the major cities. In Boston, a banquet was held that was attended by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Louis Agassiz, the mayor of Boston, the President of Harvard, and other educators, poets, and scientists. At the banquet, Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes proposed a toast to “the health of Paul Morphy, The World Chess Champion”.

Morphy was a celebrity. Manufacturers sought his endorsements, newspapers asked him to write chess columns, and a baseball club was named after him.

Morphy abandons chess

Morphy reportedly declared that he would play no more matches with anyone unless he was giving odds of pawn and move (in a match between two evenly matched Masters, a pawn advantage is considered a winning advantage). After returning to his home, he declared himself retired from the game, and with a few exceptions, he gave up the public playing of the game for good. He then began to think of beginning his law career. Unfortunately, he was unable to, as in 1861 the American Civil War broke out, disrupting life in New Orleans. Opposed to secession, Morphy did not serve in the Confederate Army but remained for a while in New Orleans, then left the city for Paris. He lived for a time in Paris to avoid the war, returning to New Orleans afterwards. He also lived in Havana, Cuba, for a time during the war.

His principled stance against the war was unpopular in his native South, and he was unable to begin practice of the law after the war. Attempts to open a law office failed due to a lack of clients; if anyone came to his office, it was invariably in regard to chess. Financially secure thanks to his family fortune, Morphy had effectively no profession and he spent the rest of his life in idleness. Asked by admirers to play chess again, he refused, considering chess not worthy of being treated as a serious occupation. Chess in Morphy’s day was not a respectable occupation for a gentleman, but was admired only as an amateur activity. Chess professionals in the 1860s were looked upon as akin to professional gamblers and other disreputable types. It was not until decades later that the age of the professional chess player arrived with the coming of Wilhelm Steinitz, who barely made a living and died broke, and Emanuel Lasker who, thanks to his demands for high fees, managed a good living and greatly advanced the reputation of chess as a professional endeavor.

Tragedy and twilight

Morphy’s final years were tragic. Depressed, he spent his last years wandering around the French Quarter of New Orleans, talking to people no one else could see, and having feelings of persecution.

Morphy passed away at the age of forty-seven on the afternoon of July 10, 1884. He was found dead in his bathtub by his mother. The doctor said Morphy had suffered congestion of the brain (stroke), brought on by entering cold water after being very warm from his long midday walk. In 1891, the family sold the mansion, which is today the site of Brennan’s restaurant.

Morphy’s chess play

Today many amateurs think of Morphy as a dazzling combinative player, who excelled in sacrificing his Queen and checkmating his opponent a few brilliant moves later. One reason for this impression is that chess books like to reprint his flashy games. There are games where he did do this, but it was not the basis of his chess style. In fact, the masters of his day considered his style to be on the conservative side compared to some of the flashy older masters like La Bourdonnais and even Anderssen.

Morphy can be considered the first modern player. Some of his games do not look modern because he did not need the sort of slow positional systems that modern grandmasters use, or that Staunton, Paulsen, and later Steinitz developed. His opponents had not yet mastered the open game, so he played it against them and he preferred open positions because they brought quick success. He played open games almost to perfection, but he also could handle any sort of position, having a complete grasp of chess that was years ahead of his time. Morphy was a player who intuitively knew what was best, and in this regard he has been likened to Capablanca. He was, like Capablanca, a child prodigy; he played fast and he was hard to beat. Löwenthal and Anderssen both later remarked that he was indeed hard to beat since he knew how to defend and would draw or even win games despite getting into bad positions. At the same time, he was deadly when given a promising position. Anderssen especially commented on this, saying that after one bad move against Morphy one may as well resign. “I win my games in seventy moves but Mr. Morphy wins his in twenty, but that is only natural…” Anderssen said, explaining his poor results against Morphy.

Of Morphy’s 59 “serious” games — those played in matches and the 1857 New York tournament — he won 42, drew 9, and lost 8.

Some chess grandmasters consider Morphy to have been the greatest chessplayer who ever lived. Others have disagreed with the more extreme claims.

Source page: Wikipedia under Wikipedia license

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Charles_Morphy


17
Feb

Karl Ernst Adolf Anderssen – Germany

Karl Ernst Adolf Anderssen (July 6, 1818 – March 13, 1879) was a famous German chess master, one of the most renowned of the classic masters of 19th century chess. He had a long and distinguished chess career, at times considered the leading player in the world, and world famous for his sparkling play even today.

Background and early life
Anderssen was born in Breslau, Germany (now Wrocław, Poland) in 1818. He lived in the city of his birth for most of his life, never married, living with and supporting his widowed mother and his unmarried sister. Anderssen graduated from the public gymnasium in Breslau, then attended university where he studied mathematics and philosophy. He graduated, and took a position at the Friedrichs-Gymnasium as an instructor in 1847 (29 year old) and later Professor of Mathematics. Anderssen lived a quiet, stable, responsible, respectable, middle-class life. His career was teaching math, while his hobby and passion was playing chess.

When Anderssen was nine years old, his father taught him how to play. Anderssen said that as a boy, he learned the strategy of the game from a copy of William Lewis’s book Fifty Games between Labourdonnais and McDonnell(1835). Anderssen was not a chess prodigy; his progress was deliberate, and by 1840 at age twenty-two, he had not yet surpassed German masters such as Ludwig Bledow, von der Lasa, and Wilhelm Hanstein.

Anderssen first came to the attention of the chess world when he published some short and lively chess problems in 1842. Then in 1846, he became an editor with the magazine Schachzeitung (later called Deutsche Schachzeitung).

[edit] London 1851
In 1848 Anderssen drew a match with the professional player Daniel Harrwitz. On the basis of this match and his general chess reputation, he received an invitation to be the standard-bearer for German chess at the world’s first international chess tournament, London 1851. Anderssen was reluctant to accept the invitation, as travel costs were a substantial issue to his limited pocketbook. However, Howard Staunton offered to pay Anderssen’s travel expenses out of his own pocket if necessary, should Anderssen fail to win a tournament prize. This was a generous offer, and Anderssen made the trip. At that tournament, Anderssen defeated Lionel Kieseritzky, József Szén, Staunton, and Marmaduke Wyvill, winning the tournament to everyone’s surprise.

Anderssen was celebrated as well for two of his casual chess games in which he was victorious through combinations involving heavy sacrifice of the pieces. In the first, called the Immortal Game, as white against Lionel Kieseritzky in 1851, he sacrificed a bishop, both rooks and finally his queen. In the second played in Berlin, in the year 1852, as white against Jean Dufresne, the total sacrifice was more modest, but still exceeded a queen and a minor piece. That game has since been called the Evergreen Game.

For the next few years he was considered by many people to be the world’s premier player, but as he needed to earn for living, he had to go back for teaching again after the competition. Then in 1858 he was beaten by the American star Paul Morphy in a famous match held in Paris, France, losing by a score of two wins versus Morphy’s seven, with two draws.

Anderssen played the curious initial move of 1. a3 in the match against Morphy, and this opening move is now referred to as “Anderssen’s Opening.” The opening has never been popular in serious competition.

[edit] London 1862
Three years after being defeated by Morphy, Anderssen came back and won London 1862, the first international round-robin event (in which each participant plays a game against all the others) with a score of twelve wins out of thirteen games, losing only to John Owen. Morphy had retired from chess at this time.

In 1866 he played and lost a close match (6:8) with young Wilhelm Steinitz (30 year-old). The match introduced a number of new ideas to the field of chess strategy. A few modern writers say that after the match Steinitz was the world champion, but the players themselves did not make any such claim, nor did anybody else at the time. Later Anderssen lost a second match against Steinitz.

Anderssen was generally well liked and considered very honest. Steinitz wrote: “Anderssen was honest and honourable to the core. Without fear or favour he straightforwardly gave his opinion, and his sincere disinterestedness became so patent….that his word alone was usually sufficient to quell disputes…for he had often given his decision in favour of a rival…”

[edit] Baden-Baden 1870
Anderssen’s greatest chess achievement came late in his life, when he won Baden-Baden 1870, the strongest tournament ever held up to its time. He finished first ahead of his old nemesis Steinitz, as well as the great players Neumann and Blackburne.

Still playing strongly, Anderssen’s last major victory was placing second at Leipzig 1877, at the age of fifty nine. Two years later, he died.

The Deutsche Schachzeitung noted his death in 1879 with a nineteen page obituary.

Source page: Wikipedia under Wikipedia license

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Anderssen


17
Feb

Howard Staunton – England

Howard Staunton (April 1810–June 22, 1874) was an English chess master and unofficial World Chess Champion. He was also a newspaper chess columnist, chess book author, and minor Shakespearean scholar. His name is remembered most today for the style of chess figures he endorsed, the “Staunton” pattern of chess pieces.

Little is known about the life of Staunton before his appearance on the chess scene. He said he was born in Westmorland and his father’s name was William. He was poor and had no official education when he was young. He said he was an actor as a young man, that he once played the role of Lorenzo in The Merchant of Venice and he had acted with the famous English actor Edmund Kean.

First steps in chess

It is documented that in 1836, Staunton was in London, and he made a subscription to William Walker’s book Games at Chess, actually played in London, by the late Alexander McDonnell Esq. Staunton was apparently twenty-six years old when he began to take an interest in the game. He said that at that time, he was a “rook player.”

From age twenty-six on, he began a serious pursuit of the game. In 1838 he played many games with Captain William Evans, inventor of the Evans Gambit. He also played a match against the German chess writer Aaron Alexandre, losing.

In 1840 he began writing, doing a chess column for the New Court Gazette from May to the end of the year. He had improved sufficiently by 1840 to play and win a match with the German master Popert, which he won by a single game. He also began writing for British Miscellany which in 1841 led to his founding the chess magazine known as the Chess Player’s Chronicle. Staunton edited the magazine until 1854, when he was succeeded by Robert Barnett Brien.

Match vs. St. Amant

In 1842 he played hundreds of games with John Cochrane. Cochrane was a strong player, and Staunton had a good warm-up for what was to be his greatest chess achievement the following year. In 1843, Staunton played a short match with France’s champion, Pierre St. Amant, who was visiting London. Staunton lost the match, 3.5-2.5, but later arrangements where made for a second match, to be held in Paris. Staunton went to Paris, where from November 14 to December 20, 1843, he played a match at the Cafe de la Regence against St. Amant, beating him decisively, 13-8. After St. Amant’s defeat, no other Frenchmen arose to continue the tradition of French chess supremacy started with Philidor, and London became the chess capital of the world. Staunton was unofficially recognised as the best player of the world from 1843 to 1851.

Staunton was now recognized as the world’s strongest chess player. He went to Paris the next year to again play St. Amant, but by suffering from severe pneumonia, which had damaged his health permanently, the match was cancelled at the last minute. They never played again.

Chess literary efforts

In 1845 Staunton began a chess column for the Illustrated London News, which he continued for the rest of his life. According to The Oxford Companion to Chess, Staunton’s column was the most influential chess column in the world. On the ninth of April, Staunton, as the representative of London, won a telegraph game (a variation of a blindfold game with people in other locations) with a group of five to six people, which took about eight hours to finish the game.

Staunton played matches with lesser players at pawn and move odds, but played even with the masters Horwitz and Harrwitz in 1846, beating each in matches.

In 1847 Staunton wrote his most famous work, The Chess-Player’s Handbook, which didn’t go out of print until 1993. Another book, The Chess-Player’s Companion followed in 1849.

Staunton pattern chess pieces

In 1849, a chess set designed by Nathaniel Cook was registered, and manufacturing rights obtained by John Jaques for his company Jaques of London. Staunton advertised the new set in his chess column in the Illustrated London News. Each set was sold with a pamphlet written by Staunton, and Staunton received a royalty on each set sold. The design was very attractive, became popular, and Staunton men have become the standard set for both professional and amateur chess players ever since.

London 1851 Tournament

In May 1851, London held host to the Great Exhibition, and London’s thriving chess community, the world’s most active, felt obliged to do something similar for chess. Staunton then took it upon himself to organise the world’s first chess tournament, to be held in London along with the World Industrial Great Exhibition. The idea was to invite the world’s leading masters to compete, and showcase chess the way the Great Exhibition was showcasing the world’s technology and culture. He persuaded some of the chess amateurs in London and raised funds of £500 – a large sum of money at that time – to help to host the event.

Although the chess club of London refused to send anybody to enter the competition, London 1851 was still a success, though Staunton perhaps was disappointed, after a month long battle among sixteen world class chess players, he was knocked out of the battle for first place by the eventual winner, Adolf Anderssen, then beaten for the runner-up prize by his former pupil Elijah Williams. It is clear that Staunton’s best playing days were now over, but his reputation as the world’s leading chess authority was bolstered among amateurs by his books and his self-promotion in his chess columns. Still, Staunton had some fight left in him, as later that year he took revenge on Williams by beating him, six wins to four with one draw, as well as crushing Karl Jaenisch in a match, seven wins to two, with one draw.

In 1852 Staunton wrote a book about London 1851 titled, The Chess Tournament. The title page to that book read, “By H. Staunton, Esq., author of The Handbook of Chess, Chess-players Companion, &c.&c.&c” to which in 1853 a fifteen or sixteen-year-old lad named Paul Morphy scribbled in his copy, “and some devilish bad games”. If Staunton was famous for his achievement as the best chess player in the world during the period 1843-1851, then after 1851 to his last days in 1874, he was most famous for his contribution in making England the capital of the chess world. In 1874 Morphy was more polite, and gave his estimate that Staunton’s best gift was not in playing chess, but as a theoretician and analyst. In some ways Staunton’s style presaged more modern methods; the English opening (1. c4) was so named because he often used it in the period 1840-50.

The American World Champion Robert Fischer, writing on Staunton more than a century later, had a much more flattering appraisal. “Playing over his games”, Fischer said, “I find they are completely modern.” So Staunton was actually well ahead of his time, playing in a style which would become known as the Hypermodern in the 1920s.

In 1853 Staunton made a trip to Brussels to meet with Baron Tassilo von Heydebrand und der Lasa. They discussed the standardization of the rules of chess, and played a short match, which ended in the baron’s favor, five wins to four with three draws.

Withdrawal from active chess playing

By 1856 Staunton was beginning to withdraw from chess and turned to writing about Shakespeare as his main occupation. He secured a contract with a publisher to create an annotated edition of the great bard’s works. Unfortunately, Staunton’s ego would not allow him to let go of his desire to be in the top ranks of chess mastery, but privately he must have sensed that the standard of play of the top masters was rapidly improving, and his was not. Staunton entered the fray again by playing in a tournament held in Birmingham in 1858, under the auspices of the new British Chess Association. Staunton didn’t get far, being knocked out by Johann Löwenthal in two straight games.

Birmingham 1858 was to be Staunton’s last public chess competition. Staunton refused to play Paul Morphy in public during the latter’s visit to England in 1858, saying he was too busy working on his Shakespeare annotations. This refusal apparently had a negative impact upon Morphy, out of all proportion to its real significance. Likely, Staunton, who was well past his peak as well as being out of practice, sized up the much younger (Morphy was 27 years younger) American’s stunning chess and concluded that he had virtually no chance against him, so why bother playing? Morphy took this as a nasty snub from one gentleman to another.

True to his word, Staunton now concentrated on writing on Shakespeare and chess. By 1860 his edition of Shakespeare had been published. Staunton considered it a great work, but modern day critics do not agree, and Staunton is an obscure name in modern Shakespearean scholarship. Staunton also published a book in 1860 titled Chess Praxis, which to take advantage of the public’s desire for Morphy material had over 168 pages of the American’s games annotated by Staunton.

Shakespearean scholar

Staunton published many articles on Shakespeare in 1864 and 1865. His final book was Great Schools of England published in 1865. He was working on yet another chess book, when his life came to an end at age 64. He died at his desk in his library. His final book was published posthumously in 1876 under the editorship of R.B. Wormald, and titled Chess: Theory and Practice.

A memorial plaque now hangs at his old residence of 117 Lansdowne Road, London W11. In 1997 a memorial stone bearing an engraving of a chess knight was raised to mark his grave at Kensal Green Cemetery in London. Prior to this his grave had been unmarked.

Source page: Wikipedia under Wikipedia license
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Staunton


17
Feb

Louis-Charles Mah̩ de La Bourdonnais РFrance

Louis-Charles Mah̩ de La Bourdonnais (1795 Р1840) was a French chess master, possibly the strongest player in the early 19th century.

The end position of the game MacDonnell-La Bourdonnais, London 1834 after the Black move 37. … e2

De La Bourdonnais was considered to be the unofficial world champion (there was no official title at the time) from 1821, when he became able to beat his chess teacher Alexandre Deschapelles, until his death in 1840. The most famous match series, indeed considered as the world championship, was the one against Alexander McDonnell in 1834.

Source page: Wikipedia under Wikipedia license

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis-Charles_Mah%C3%A9_de_La_Bourdonnais


17
Feb

Alexandre Deschapelles – France

Alexandre Deschapelles (March 7, 1780–1847) was a French chess player who, for a time, was probably the strongest player in the world. He was considered the unofficial world champion from about 1800-1820. When his student, Louis de la Bourdonnais could beat him, Deschapelles retired from chess.

Source page: Wikipedia under Wikipedia license
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandre_Deschapelles


17
Feb

Fran̤ois-Andr̩ Danican Philidor РFrance

François-André Danican Philidor (September 7, 1726 – August 31, 1795) was a French chess player and composer. He was regarded as the best single chess player of his age, although the title of World Chess Champion was not yet in existence. Philidor’s book Analyse du jeu des Échecs was considered a standard chess manual for at least a century. He is referred to here as André Danican Philidor, the name commonly used during his lifetime.

Philidor started playing regularly around 1740 at the chess Mecca of France, the Café de la Régence. The best player in France at the time, Legall de Kermeur, taught him. At first, Legall could give Philidor rook odds, a handicap in which the stronger player starts without one of his rooks, but in only three years, Philidor was his equal, and then surpassed him. Philidor visited England in 1747 and decisively beat the Syrian Phillip Stamma in a match +8 =1 -1, despite the fact Philidor let Stamma have white in every game.

Philidor astounded his peers by playing three blindfold chess games simultaneously in the chess club of St. James Street in London on 9 May 1783. Philidor let all three opponents play white, and gave up a pawn for the third player. Some affidavits were signed, because those persons who were involved doubted that future generations would believe that such a feat was possible. Now three games would be fairly unremarkable among many chess masters. Even when he was in his late years, when he was 67 years old (1793), he played two blindfold games simultaneously in London, and he won.

In 1749, Philidor published his famous book Analyse du jeu des Échecs. It was such an advance in chess knowledge that by 1871, it had gone through about 70 editions, and had been translated into English, German and Italian. In the book he analyzed nine different types of game openings. Most of the openings of Philidor are designed to strengthen and establish a strong defensive center using pawns. He is the first one to realize the new role of the pawn in the chess game; and his most famous advice was the saying “The pawns are the soul of chess”. It was said that the reason why Philidor emphasized the pawns in the chess game was related to the political background during the eighteenth century of France, and that he regarded pawns as the “Third rank” on the chess board (citizens were regarded as the third rank of the society before the French Revolution started in 1789). He also included analysis of certain positions of rook + bishop v rook, such analysis being still current theory even today. He is most famous for showing an important drawing technique with a rook versus a rook and pawn, in a position known as the Philidor position. The Philidor Defense (1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6) is named for him.

Musical career

Philidor joined the Royal choir of Louis XV in 1732 at the age of six, and made his first attempt at the composition of a song at the age of 11. It was said that Louis XV wanted to listen to the choir almost every day, and the singers, while waiting for the king to arrive, played chess to relieve their boredom; this may have sparked Philidor’s interest in chess. From 1750 to 1770 Philidor was a leading opera composer in France, and during his music career produced twenty-one music comedies and one opera. However, when he felt that he was being surpassed by other composers, such as André Ernest Modeste Grétry, Philidor decided to concentrate on chess.

Final years

Philidor was stuck in England when the French Revolution occurred. Because of many of his social connections mentioned above, the Revolutionary Government put him on the banned list. He died on August 31, 1795 in London and was buried in St James, Piccadilly. A few days later, his relatives succeeded in getting his name removed from the list.

Source page: Wikipedia under Wikipedia license
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois-Andr%C3%A9_Danican_Philidor


17
Feb

Legall de Kermeur – France

Legall de Kermeur (1702 – 1792) was a French chess player.

Along with other famous players, he played in Paris’s Café de la Régence, and is considered to have been possibly the strongest player in the world around the 1730s.[citation needed] He taught chess to François-André Philidor.

Legall is the eponym of Legall’s mate, a mating pattern found in his only extant game, Legall-St Brie, Paris, 1750.

Source page: Wikipedia under Wikipedia license
“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legall_de_Kermeur”


17
Feb

Gioacchino Greco – Italy

Gioacchino Greco (1600–c.1634) was an Italian chess player and writer. Greco recorded some of the first chess games on record, 77 in total. His games, all against anonymous opponents (“NN”), were quite possibly constructs, but acted as highly useful tools for spotting opening traps.

Gioachino Greco was a remarkable chess player between Ruy López de Segura and François-André Danican Philidor. As one of the players during the age of “Italian Romantic Style”, he studied the Italian opening (1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bc4), and published his analysis in the form of short games around 1625. In 1665, after his death, the manuscripts were published in London. These games are regarded as classics of early chess literature and are still sometimes taught to beginners. Greco loved to use the Sicilian Defence, which was invented by an Italian bishop.

Greco paved the way for many of the attacking legends of the Romantic era, such as Adolf Anderssen, Paul Morphy, and François Philidor.

Source page: Wikipedia under Wikipedia license
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gioacchino_Greco

Powered by Wordpress 2YI.net Web Directory